Legal Opinion
United States v. James E. Farr
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 17, 2005No. 04-3502PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
Defendant-appellant James Farr was convicted of bank fraud and related offenses, for which the district court sentenced him to twenty-seven months of incarceration and five years of supervised release. After Farr served his prison term and was released, the district court ordered him to pay $208,169.44 in restitution as a condition of his supervised release. Upon Farr’s appeal, and for the reasons stated herein, we vacate the district court’s order of restitution.
I. Background
On February 9, 2001, a jury convicted Farr of one count of bank fraud, one count of interstate…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. David S. BokCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. James E. FarrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Paul J. GrimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. William H. RandleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. WebberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MorelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MorelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Atunnise v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.