Barbary v. Benz
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
*410Opinion by
Mr. Justice Pringle.
The plaintiffs in error (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs) instituted two attachment proceedings on June 28, 1966, pursuant to R.C.P. Colo. 102(b). The required affidavits alleged that the defendant in error (the defendant) was indebted to the plaintiffs for legal services and for certain other debts. The causes for attachment set forth in the affidavits were (1) that the defendant was about to fraudulently conceal her property from creditors or to depart the state with the intention of having her effects removed from the state; and (2) that the defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Teodonno v. BachmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Carlson v. BainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Rowe v. BowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Wehle v. KerbsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Colorado Vanadium Corp. v. Western Colorado Power Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.