Legal Opinion

Colorado Vanadium Corp. v. Western Colorado Power Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 5, 1923No. 10,197PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Fifteen separate actions by different plaintiffs, who are defendants in error, were brought against the defendant, plaintiff in error, to recover money judgments. Each plaintiff filed an affidavit for attachment under the eighth ground of section 98 of our Attachment Act, charging that the defendant “is about to fraudulently convey or transfer or assign his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors, or some one or more of them.” The defendant corporation filed a traverse in attachment in all but two of the actions, and in each of these two the traverse, such as it was, is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dyer v. McPheeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  2. Mastin v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Wehle v. KerbsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  4. Midland Fuel Co. v. SchuesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. One Certain AutomobileSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Rare Metals Mining & Milling Co. v. Western Colorado Power Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Old Republic National Title Insurance Co. v. KornegayColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Barbary v. BenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. R. H. Mitchell Lumber & Hardware Co. v. Northwestern Lumber & Shingle Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API