Legal Opinion
Horecny v. Raichl
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1977No. 75-343, SC 25012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.
Plaintiff 1 sold two acres of his land in Clatsop County, the "western parcel,” to defendant in 1958 and retained the "eastern parcel.” Plaintiff also retained a 20' roadway through the two acres to his "eastern parcel” by the following language in the land sale contract and in the deed:
"The purchaser is granted by the sellers, their heirs and assigns, the right to use, and the sellers reserve to themselves, their heirs and assigns, the right to use for road purposes, the road now existing, which is described as a roadway 20 feet in width [further legal description omitted] * * (Emphasis…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Tucker v. NudingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Hoffman v. DorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Williams v. EmmettOregon Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Faulconer v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Abbott v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Nice v. PridayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Mimbres Hot Springs Ranch v. VargasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
- Raichl v. HorecnyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993