Legal Opinion

Succession of Clement

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1919No. 23474PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Parish of Webster; J. N. Sandlin, Judge. In the matter of the succession of O. P. Clement. There was judgment in favor of the Bank of Webster and the Bank of Min-den, opponents of the account of the adminis-tratrix, and the widow, as administratrix and as tutrix of the minor children, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

O. P. Clement died, intestate, in 1917, leaving a widow and five minor children, and an insolvent succession. Among the assets of the succession were two life insurance policies, payable “unto his executors, administrators or assigns,” one in the New York Life Insurance Company for $1,500, oated the 5th of February, 1909, and one in the Penn Mutual, for $3,000, dated the 4th of May, 1914. The widow was appointed and qualified as administratrix of the succession and as tutrix of her five minor children. She collected, as administratrix, $1,472 in settlement of the New York Life policy, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Succession of Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Guarantee Loan & Trust Co. v. FayWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Skinner v. HoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Rice v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Blouin v. LedetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Succession of ErwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Daniel v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Parrott v. SellersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Succession of SharpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API