Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance v. Rowland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1986No. 72634, 72635PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Jim H. Rowland, d/b/a Rowland and Mercer Garage (plaintiff), instituted an action against The Hartford Fire Insurance Company (Hartford) for loss under a policy of automobile insurance. In addition to damages for breach of the insurance contract, plaintiff sought statutory damages under OCGA § 33-34-6 (b), (c). Plaintiff also sought general damages and punitive damages based on a tort claim for Hartford’s willful failure to pay under the insurance contract.

During the course of a jury trial the following evidence, in pertinent part, was adduced: Plaintiff’s automobile…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Dependable Insurance Co. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. McClainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Carter v. BanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  5. Binns v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Pritchett v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Thomas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bendiburg v. DempseyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989
  5. F. D. Wilson Trucking Co. v. FerneyhoughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API