Legal Opinion
State v. Powell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 29, 1986No. C83-05-32441, C83-08-33968, C83-08-33966; CA A35549PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for unlawful racketeering activity, ORS 166.7201 (ORICO), and for two thefts in the first degree. ORS 164.055.2 The indictments were consolidated for trial.
Defendant’s first assignment is that the trial court erred by denying his demurrer to the unlawful racketeering activity indictment, which alleged in material part:3
“COUNT II
“As part of the same act and transaction alleged in Count I herein, the defendant is accused by the Grand Jury of Multnomah County, Oregon, by this indictment of the crime of
UNLAWFUL RACKETEERING ACTIVITY
committed as follows:
“The said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. MathieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. SweetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994