Legal Opinion

State v. Sweet

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 5, 1980No. 79-1385M, CA 15693PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P. J.

The state contends the trial court erred in sustaining defendant’s demurrer to a complaint charging defendant and 11 others with criminal mischief in the second degree, ORS 164.354(1)(b).1

The charging part of the complaint is set forth as follows:

"The above named defendants are accused * * * by this complaint of the crime of criminal mischief in the second degree, committed as follows, to-wit: That the said defendants on or about the date of July 8, 1979, in Klamath County, Oregon then and there being, and acting together, did unlawfully and recklessly damage: Aspen Lake meadow; Aspen Creek…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. MathieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API