Legal Opinion

Banks v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 24, 2013No. AC 33940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, C. J.

The petitioner, Ronnell Banks, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying *333his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the denial of his petition was improper because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing (1) to introduce a police report into evidence and cross-examine witnesses therefrom, and (2) to request a continuance to prepare for the cross-examination of a witness. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

Following a jury trial, the petitioner was convicted of the crimes of sale of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Thomas v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Hall v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Madagoski v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Placide v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Nieves v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Rojas v. Comm'r of Corr.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API