Legal Opinion

Nieves v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 6, 2016No. AC38172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

Following a grant of certification to appeal, the petitioner, Angel Nieves, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly concluded that he had not demonstrated that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to present an exculpatory statement made by a state's witness describing the perpetrator of the crime with which the petitioner was charged. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following undisputed facts and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Chace v. BronsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smorodska v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  2. Nieves v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  3. State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API