Legal Opinion

Rojas v. Comm'r of Corr.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 21, 2017No. AC 38238PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPellegrino, J.

*695Following a grant of certification to appeal, the petitioner, Luis Rojas, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court erred by not concluding that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to negotiate a plea bargain on his behalf, and by not concluding that the petitioner was prejudiced by his trial counsel's failure to properly investigate his case. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

In 2008, the petitioner was convicted, following a jury trial, of robbery in the *711first degree in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Sackett v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Sanders v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rojas v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API