Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1982No. 13607PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

Two questions are presented by this case. First, does representation by the public defender of multiple defendants in a criminal prosecution violate a defendant’s constitu tional right to effective assistance of counsel, absent a showing of facts indicating a possible conflict of interest among the defendants? Second, do separate judgments of conviction of burglary in the second degree and of grand larceny, relating to the same general set of events, violate a defendant’s constitutional and statutory protection against double jeopardy? The district court answered both questions…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. State v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. PancakeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wolfe v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. GreensweigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API