Legal Opinion
Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 22, 2003No. Nos. 02-7007 to 02-7010PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Circuit Judge GAJARSA concurs-in-part, dissents-in-part.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Paralyzed Veterans of America (“PVA”), Disabled American Veterans (“DAV”), National Organization of Veterans’ Advocates, Inc. (“NOVA”), and National Organization of Black Veterans, John J. Castillo, and Joseph Holmes (“NABVETS”) (collectively “Petitioners”) challenge the validity of various regulations promulgated by the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA” or “Secretary”) to implement the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat. 2096…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dingess - Hartman v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Vazquez-Flores v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Angel Vazquez-Flores v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
- Earlee King v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
- Paralyzed Veterans of America, and Disabled American Veterans, and National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc., and National Association of Black Veterans, John J. Castillo, and Joseph Holmes v. Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.