Legal Opinion

SURMAN v. PAYNE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00216Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NICHOLINA SURMAN, and ) STEPHEN SURMAN, H/W, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-216 ) Plaintiffs, ) ) JUDGE KIM R. GIBSON v. ) ) ROBERT PAYNE, and ) DOT TRANSPORTATION, INC., ) ) Defendants/Third-Party ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) STEPHEN SURMAN, ) ) Third-Party Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Third-Party Defendant Stephen Surman’s (“Surman”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 41) on Third-Party Plaintiffs Robert Payne (“Payne”) and DOT Transportation, Inc.’s (“DOT”) negligence claim arising out of an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API