Messer v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[T1] The Appellant contends that the district court erred in revoking his probation because the State failed to carry its burden of proving that he acted willfully. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] The Appellant states the issue simply as being whether the trial court erred in revoking his probation. In his brief, however, he raises two separate questions:
1. Whether the State or the defendant has the burden of proof at a probation revocation hearing?
2. Whether the State proved that he willfully violated the terms of his probation?
FACTS
[¶3] The underlying facts of this case are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Gailey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Kupec v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Messer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Anderson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Edrington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Reece v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Sharp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008