Edrington v. State

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Christopher Edrington, contests the district court's decision to revoke his probation. Appellant admits that he violated his probation but asserts that his violation was not willful because he was suffering from mental illness at the time and that the district court therefore abused its discretion when it reinstated his suspended sentence. We affirm the district court's decision.

ISSUE

[¶2] Did the district court abuse its discretion when it revoked Appellant's probation? . ©

FACTS

[¶3] On April 10, 2006, Appellant agreed to plead nolo contendere 1 to…