Legal Opinion

Exxonmobil Oil Corp. v. Nicoletti Oil, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 18, 2010No. 109-cv-01498-OWW-DLBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 24)

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Exxonmobil Oil Corp. (“Plaintiff’) is proceeding with an action pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B)) against Defendants Nicoletti Oil, Inc., Dino J. Nicoletti, and John A. Nicoletti. In addition to asserting federal claims against Defendants, Plaintiff asserts several state law causes of action.

Plaintiff filed an original complaint against Defendants on August 24, 2009. (Doc. 1). Defendants filed a motion…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RenzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API