Legal Opinion

United States v. Halford

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 2, 1999No. 98-0325/APublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge CRAWFORD

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by officer members of rape, false official statement, and false swearing, in violation of Articles 120, 107, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 920, 907, and 934, respectively. The convening authority approved the sentence of a dishonorable discharge, 2 years’ confinement, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed.

We granted review on the following issues:

I. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ADMITTING THE ACUTE STRESS…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. HouserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. GipsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. McElhaneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  3. United States v. FlesherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  4. United States v. EslingerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  5. United States v. JonesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API