Legal Opinion

State v. Downs

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 30, 2006No. 26156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

We are asked to decide whether appellant, who has been sentenced to die for murder, is mentally competent to waive his right to challenge his conviction and death sentence and be executed. We conclude appellant is competent.

PROCEDURAL FACTS

Appellant pled guilty to the crimes of murder, kidnapping, and criminal sexual conduct with a minor. A hearing was then held to determine whether he was guilty but mentally ill (GBMI). An expert, Dr. Everett Kuglar, testified appellant was mentally ill. However, two other experts, Dr. Jeffrey Musick and Dr. Pamela Crawford, testified appellant was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Singleton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. DownsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. McMillianSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MottsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API