Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 2008No. 26477PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice WALLER:

This matter concerns a capital defendant who has expressed a desire to waive his post-conviction relief (PCR) proceedings and all future appeals and have an execution date set. By order dated July 24, 2007, we remanded the matter to Judge Doyet Early to conduct a hearing to determine whether Hill is competent to waive his right to further review and, if so, whether his waiver is knowing and voluntary. After a hearing, Judge Early found Hill competent to waive his rights; he also found Hill’s waiver to be knowing and voluntary. Counsel for Hill concedes the record “fully…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Singleton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Council v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. MottsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API