Application of Harry Dudley Wright
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1DissentAlmond, Judge
J., joins).
I disagree with the majority opinion. It seems clear to me that the claims of the application are directed to the identical invention claimed in appellant’s patent.
Claims 1-3 of the application are drawn to a plural switch assembly, as are claims 7-11 of the patent. In essential part, all of these claims are directed to an assembly of individual switch units each comprising a rotary switch member having symbols thereon, a stationary contract structure and a window for viewing the symbols which additionally serves as an opening through which finger engaging lugs on the wheel extend.
C…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re SarettUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- In re SiuCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Application of Douglas J. BridgefordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Wilhelm E. Walles, William F. Tousignant and Thomas Houtman, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Constantin ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.