Legal Opinion
Oishi v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 3, 1982No. AL-459PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
418 So.2d 329 (1982)
Howard T. OISHI, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. AL-459.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
August 3, 1982.
Howard T. Oishi, pro se.
Malcolm S. Greenfield, Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole and Probation Com'n, Tallahassee, for respondent.
2Per curiam
Petitioner, an inmate in the custody of the Department of Corrections, brings this petition for writ of mandamus to compel the Florida Parole and Probation Commission to comply with its statutory duty by interviewing him and establishing a presumptive parole release date. We grant the petition…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Winstead v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Battis v. Florida Parole & Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- James v. FLA. PAROLE AND PROB. COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Greer v. FLA. PAROLE & PROB. COMM.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Hayes v. Florida Parole & Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
4Cited by4 opinions
- Roberson v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Pisano v. ShillingerWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Pisano v. ShillingerWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009