Legal Opinion
Battis v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 24, 1980No. UU-459, UU-395 and UU-457PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
386 So.2d 295 (1980)
Arthur BATTIS, Jr., Reginald Payne and Earl Bernard Sutton, Petitioners,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Respondent.
Nos. UU-459, UU-395 and UU-457.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 24, 1980.
Arthur Battis, Jr., pro se.
Reginald Payne, pro se.
Earl Bernard Sutton, pro se.
Michael H. Davidson, Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole and Probation Commission, Tallahassee, for respondent.
2Per curiam
The petitioners seek relief from the commission's failure to act in setting their presumptive parole release dates. Like petitions have been presented to the court with…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. Florida Parole and Probation CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Baker v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
4Cited by15 opinions
- Daniels v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Ellard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Roberson v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Jenrette v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- James v. FLA. PAROLE AND PROB. COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.