Pisano v. Shillinger
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurrence
URBIGKIT, Justice,
specially concurring.
I completely concur with the majority and additionally write to recognize the fundamental principle that access to judicial review upon parole revocation — like probation termination — is constitutionally required.
Intrinsic to any constitutional review for parole revocation is a first responsibility to apply the foundational decisions of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the federal constitution. Wyoming judicial obligation then requires this court to accord legal attention to the structure of this state by application of judicial review under…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.