Los Altos School District v. Watson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
In this proceeding in eminent domain the defendant has taken a timely appeal from the final order of condemnation as that term is used in section 1253 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
He is complaining of an asserted insufficiency of the findings of fact upon which the judgment which determined the right to condemn and fixed the amount of damages is based. Such a question is not within the purview of this appeal, particularly in view of the fact that the notice of appeal was filed more than 60 days after entry of the judgment. †
However, we will discuss the point defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Pacific Ry. Co. v. FeldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Kern County Union High School District v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Russakov v. the McCarthy Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Montebello Unified School District v. KeayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- San Francisco Unified School District v. Hong MowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
3Cited by8 opinions
- Watson v. Los Altos School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Hayward Union High School District v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- McCrady v. Western Farmers Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Lux Land & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.