Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Toussie
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 25, 2003No. CV01-4568 DRHWDWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have made a renewed motion to amend the complaint. For the reasons discussed infra, the Court denies the motion as futile. As more fully discussed herein, the Court concludes that claims against certain of the defendants cannot be rehabilitated. However, revised pleading may cure some of the defects identified as to other defendants. As a result, leave to renew this motion shall be subject to the restrictions of this Order. In the Discussion portion of this Order, the Court addresses each of the parties’ proffered arguments. The purpose of this…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- M & T Mortgage Corp. v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Caputo v. Copiague Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Provident Bank v. Community Home Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Hirsch v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. Ex Rel. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc. v. Carmichael (In Re Carmichael)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.