Riverside Residence Co. v. Husted
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
The plaintiff in error, which was the defendant in the trial court, entered into an agreement with the defendant in error hy which it sold and undertook to convey to her lots Nos. 6 and 7, in block No. 1, as laid out on map of the defendant company of record in the clerk’s office of the Circuit Court of Norfolk county, for the price of fifteen hundred dollars, $100 to be paid in cash, and monthly installments of $87.50 thereafter until the whole sum of $1,500 was paid, at which time the defendant company was to convey the lots in fee simple, free from all liens, to the plaintiff. The latjer…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Newberry v. RuffinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Buena Vista Co. v. McCandlishSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Johnson's ex'x v. Jennings' adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1853
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bolling v. King Coal Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Adamson's Administrator v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1911
- Carter Coal Co. v. LitzDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1943
- Harris County Inv. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Scott v. PilipoHawaii Supreme Court · 1917