Legal Opinion
People v. Drennan
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 2000No. C033959PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
Craig Boyd Drennan, who was superintendent of the Modoc Unified School District, was convicted of violating Penal Code section 632, subdivision (a) (intentional eavesdropping upon or recording of a confidential communication), based upon the installation of a hidden video camera, which took periodic photographs, without accompanying sound, of the area of the desk, computer, file cabinet, credenza and bookcase in the office of the Modoc High School principal.
We will reverse the judgment of conviction because the photographing of the principal’s office for a purpose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oden v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Zabetian v. MEDICAL BD. OF CALIFORNIACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. GibbonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Marich v. MGM/UA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- 1901 First St. Owner, LLC v. Tustin Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.