Legal Opinion

Cole v. Byrd

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1995No. 78062PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels

The issue presented in this matter is whether an insurer is entitled to reimbursement from a plaintiff for payments the insurer made to a consulting firm, purportedly on the plaintiffs behalf. The insurer seeks reimbursement from proceeds the plaintiff recovered from third-party tortfeasors. The circuit court of De Witt County found that the services provided by the consulting firm were case-management services, and the insurer was not entitled to reimbursement under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 (West 1992)). The appellate court reversed the circuit court, finding that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reno v. Maryland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Quality Wood Products Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Burd v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Zarley v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Zephyr, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Great States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Campbell v. Eckman/Freeman & AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. F&B Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Gilchrist v. Trail King Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Gilchrist v. Trail King Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API