Cole v. Byrd
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels
The issue presented in this matter is whether an insurer is entitled to reimbursement from a plaintiff for payments the insurer made to a consulting firm, purportedly on the plaintiffs behalf. The insurer seeks reimbursement from proceeds the plaintiff recovered from third-party tortfeasors. The circuit court of De Witt County found that the services provided by the consulting firm were case-management services, and the insurer was not entitled to reimbursement under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 (West 1992)). The appellate court reversed the circuit court, finding that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reno v. Maryland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Quality Wood Products Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Burd v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Zarley v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Zephyr, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rowland v. Great States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Campbell v. Eckman/Freeman & AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- F&B Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Gilchrist v. Trail King Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Gilchrist v. Trail King Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.