Legal Opinion

McCoslin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1923No. 7929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Falls County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The facts seem amply sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion of guilt and need not be set out at length. One Mrs. Burt was an important witness for the State. There had been one trial of the case resulting in a hung jury, at which shq was not called as a witness. It appears from the qualification of appellant’s bill of exceptions No. 1 that upon cross-examination of this witness by the defense it was shown…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nothaf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Staton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Walsh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Roebuck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API