Sterling Button Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tilson, Judge:
Tbe merchandise, the classification of which is involved in the suits listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, was assessed with duty at 90 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Plaintiff claims the same to be properly dutiable at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 912 of said act as fabrics with fast edges, not exceeding 12 inches in width, wholly or in chief value of cotton, not specially provided for.
There is no report among the official papers which even indicates how the collector classified the merchandise, whether…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Robinson v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- Massce v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beer Stern Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Domestic Marble & Stone Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- International Seaway Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.