Legal Opinion
Beer Stern Import Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided December 11, 1957No. C. D. 1944PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fohd, Judge:
The suit listed above challenges the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain imported merchandise as cotton trimmings and levying duty thereon at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739. Plaintiff claims said merchandise to he properly dutiable at 17K per centum ad valorem under paragraph 912 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by said Torquay protocol, as made effective by T. D. 52820, as fabrics with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Buss & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Snow's United States Sample Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Sterling Button Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Beer Stern Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Beer Stern Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Beer Stern Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Beer Stern Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Beer Stern Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.