Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Lund-Ross Constructors Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 2003No. S-02-174PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHendry, C.J.
INTRODUCTION
Lund-Ross Constructors Co. (Lund-Ross) appeals the district court’s order overruling its motion for leave to file a cross-claim against Merrimac Stone Co. (Merrimac). Lund-Ross sought to assert a cross-claim against Merrimac to proportionately diminish its liability to Lance D. Bailey, if any, by the percentage of contributory negligence attributable to Merrimac pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,185.10 (Reissue 1995). Lund-Ross appealed after the district court entered a “final judgment” pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1315(1) (Cum. Supp. 2002). We moved the case to our docket…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Frank J. Ginett, Cross-Appellant v. Computer Task Group, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- PYCA Industries, Inc. v. Harrison County Waste Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Tess v. LAYWERS TITLE INS. CORP.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Hogan v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States General, Inc. v. Franklynn B. Albert and James M.P. D'AmicoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Weeder v. Central Community CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Kellogg v. Nebraska Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Smith v. Lincoln Meadows Homeowners Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Cerny v. Todco Barricade Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Nebraska, Inc. v. DaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.