Legal Opinion
United States General, Inc. v. Franklynn B. Albert and James M.P. D'Amico
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 6, 1986No. 85-1687PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant United States General, Inc. (“USG”), appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Franklynn B. Albert and James M.P. D’Amico. The district court found that USG’s claims against Albert and D’Amico were barred, as a matter of law, because the defendants were immune from suit. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), the district court entered an order of final judgment with respect to these defendants. We dismiss USG’s appeal because we find that the district court abused its discretion in ruling that its…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Norman Knight v. Mark J. Mills, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Robert L. Glidden v. Chromalloy American Corporation and Allied Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Anthuis v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.