Legal Opinion

Moore v. Church Hill House/Agent

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided June 18, 2003No. 03-CV-165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUDSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 8(a)(2), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [hereinafter Rule(s)] and b) Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend his Complaint.1 All parties have filed their respective responses, and Defendants have requested that the motions be decided on the pleadings. The Court is of the opinion that oral argument is unnecessary as the motions can be decided on the pleadings. For the reasons stated below, the Court will dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint.

I. BACKGROUND

Plai…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crosby v. City of GastoniaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Crosby v. City of GastoniaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API