Legal Opinion
Continental Insurance v. Beecham, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 31, 1993No. Civ. A. 88-2890(MTB)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This action involves an insurance coverage dispute between Beecham, Inc. (“Beecham”) and its insurer, the Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”), with respect to the environmental contamination of a facility in Myerstown, Pennsylvania previously owned by Beecham. Presently before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment for declaratory relief concerning the rights and liabilities under the contracts of insurance entered into by the parties, which motions, almost by definition, raise a plethora of issues.
On an initial consideration of…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Chester-O'Donley & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. The Stroh Companies, Inc. And the Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Admiral InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.