Legal Opinion

Snow v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1989No. AS-22; CA A46173; SC S36007PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*261VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

In State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445, 687 P2d 751 (1984), we held that upon proper objection polygraph evidence shall not be admissible in any trial or proceeding subject to the rules of evidence under the Oregon Evidence Code (OEC). In State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221, 233-34, 744 P2d 231 (1987), we held that polygraph evidence shall not be admissible in such trials or proceedings even if stipulated to by the parties.

We allowed review in this prison administrative segregation case to determine whether Brown and Lyon require exclusion of polygraph evidence in Department of Corrections…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. BarbaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. State v. RenfroWashington Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MontalboHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. CoffeyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hamel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Baker v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API