Legal Opinion
United States v. Frederick Tropeano, and Marlon Tropeano, David Barroso, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 11, 2001No. 2000PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
David Barroso, Jr., appeals from a conviction after a jury trial before Judge Scheindlin. He was found guilty of conspiring to commit securities and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. On appeal, Barroso contends that the district court: (i) violated the hearsay rule and the Confrontation Clause when it admitted a co-defendant’s follow-up statement sought by the government during the co-defendant’s plea allocution; (ii) erroneously charged the jury that it could find the requisite level of criminal knowledge on a conscious avoidance theory; and (iii) admitted…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Marc J. Anderson & Jeffrey E. Grubb v. Dennis Branen, Ross Kindestin, Ed WisniefskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Manley v. Ambase Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. James Saget, Also Known as HeshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Scs Communications, Inc. And Stephen C. Swid, Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. The Herrick Company, Inc. And Norton Herrick, Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Charles L. Jackson, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.