Legal Opinion

Allen v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1961No. 42,083PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jackson, J.:

In the court below, Allen sued the insurance company on a collapse clause in a fire and extended coverage insurance policy issued by the defendant company covering a dwelling house which, at the time of the alleged loss, seems to have been Allen’s home. Two other insurance companies were originally made parties defendant. These companies had issued other policies of a similar nature which insured half of any loss by collapse of the house. These companies later settled with plaintiff and paid half of the loss and were dismissed as parties to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. State v. SheflerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. DeJamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Krug v. MILLERS'MUTUAL INSURANCE ASS'NSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Parker v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  5. Rogers v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API