Legal Opinion

Nass v. Mossner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1961No. Docket 2, 3, Calendar 48,232, 48,233Published

1Opinion of the Court

363 Mich. 128 (1961)

108 N.W.2d 881

NASS

v.

MOSSNER.

Docket Nos. 2, 3, Calendar Nos. 48,232, 48,233.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 26, 1961.

Peter F. Cicinelli and Eugene D. Mossner, for plaintiffs.

Heilman & Purcell, for defendants.

DETHMERS, C.J.

In these two cases, combined for trial and appeal purposes, plaintiffs appeal from a directed verdict for defendants. Plaintiff Robert A. Nass, hereinafter called the plaintiff, was the driver and his father, plaintiff Henry W. Nass, was the owner of an automobile insured by plaintiff insurance company. Suits were for plaintiff's personal injuries…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Spencer v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. City of Dearborn v. BacilaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API