Osborne v. Canfield
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Groff, J. • cited: Smith v. Kaiser, 17 Neb., 184; Moreheadv. Adams, 18 Id., 570; Degering v. Flieh, 14 Id., 448. cited: Taylor v. Tilden, 3 Neb., 339; Kellogg v. Huntington, 4 Id., 96; Smith v. Kaiser, 17 Id., 184. .
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This action was brought in the county court of Douglas county by the defendants in error against Canfield and Reynolds to recover the sum of $368.97 upon a promissory note. An affidavit was filed for an attachment before the debt became due and an attachment issued and levied upon certain goods of the defendants in error. The defendants in error thereupon filed a motion to dissolve the attachment because the grounds upon which it has been issued were false and untrue.
On the hearing, oral testimony was taken before the judge *331in opposition to and support of the attachment. The court rendered…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hansen v. BergquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893