Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. Curtis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1893No. 4909Published

Error from the district court of Johnson county. Tried below before Broady, J.

1DissentMaxwell, C. J.

This cause was submitted to the commission, and a decision of a majority of that body not conforming to the views of this court upon one point, it is necessary to state the law upon the subject, as I understand it. The action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants in the county court by attachment. The defendants thereupon filed a motion to dissolve the attachment and supported the same by various affidavits. It was also claimed that the affidavit of one Croy, the agent of the plaintiff, was insufficient and an amendment was permitted. On all these questions the opiuion of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fahie v. PresseyOregon Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Taylor v. TildenNebraska Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Kellogg v. Huntington, Sharp & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Osborne v. CanfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API