Legal Opinion
Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 18, 1987No. Civ. A. 87-K-35PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
The history behind this action is described in my earlier opinion and order issued on March 30, 1987. In a predecessor controversy tried in this court, 645 F.Supp. 254 (Staats I), Staats brought suit against Pioneer Uravan, Inc. (PUI) for breach of a mining contract. During the course of the trial, third-party defendants Pioneer Corporation (PC) and Pioneer Nuclear, Inc. (PNI) were dismissed from the case. The jury ultimately returned a verdict in favor of Staats. Staats subsequently filed a motion for a new trial on its claims…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Prospero Associates, a Colorado General Partnership v. Burroughs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Brezinski v. F.W. Woolworth Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lowell Staats Mining Company, Inc. v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Teem PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991