Legal Opinion

Coahoma County v. Knox

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1935No. 31807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

Coahoma county filed suit against Rush H. Knox, the former Attorney General of Mississippi, to recover an allowance of two thousand dollars made by the board of supervisors for the purpose of employing an attorney to represent the county in the suit of W. F. Bond et al. v. Joe Tij Fung et al., 148 Miss. 462, 114 So. 332, and to pay the expenses of such litigation. The order allowing payment of this fund reads as follows: “Whereas, there is now pending in the Supreme Court of the United States the case of Joe Tin Lun v. Bond [279 U. S. 818, 49 S. Ct. 263, 73 L. Ed. 974], wherein there is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith County v. MangumMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Beck v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Amite County v. MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Lun v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. City of Okolona v. Chickasaw CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrison County v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Love Co. v. Town of CarthageMississippi Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API