Legal Opinion

State v. Maxfield

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1989No. Nos. 17454, 17157PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to plea negotiations, Roland Boyd Maxfield III pled guilty to a charge of aggravated battery. I.C. § 18-907. The judge sentenced Maxfield to a ten-year prison term, with a five-year minimum period of confinement. After the judgment was entered, Maxfield filed a motion under I.C.R. 35 for reduction of the sentence. The motion was denied. On appeal, Max-field contends both that the district court abused its discretion in imposing the sentence and that the court erred in denying the Rule 35 motion. We affirm.

A Rule 35 motion is a plea for leniency which may be granted if the sentence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. RoachIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. KysarIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. KysarIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API