Legal Opinion
State v. Kysar
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1989No. 17220Published
1Opinion of the Court
783 P.2d 859 (1989)
116 Idaho 992
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
David Jon KYSAR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17220.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
November 21, 1989.
Radin & Webb, Idaho Falls, for defendant-appellant. John L. Radin argued.
Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Boise, Michael A. Henderson, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent. Michael A. Henderson argued.
BAKES, Chief Justice.
Defendant David Kysar entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of robbery pursuant to I.C.R. 11(a)(2), reserving the right to review certain adverse pretrial rulings. Kysar appeals the trial court's denial…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.