Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 17, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

CASE 6. — ACTION BY JAMES SMITH AGAINST W. E. FIELDS. Appeal from Fleming Circuit Court. C. D. Newell, Circuit Judge. Judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Nunn

Eeversing.

This action was instituted by appellant for damages for the malicious prosecution of him without probable cause. The facts leading up to the prosecution of appellant occurred, in substance, as follows: Dr. J. J. Cook in his lifetime owned a farm adjoining appellee’s. There was a division fence between the farms which was erected before either Cook or appellee became the owners of their respective places. This fence had become somewhat dilapidated, and Cook tore half of it down, and put up a wire fence. Two or three years after this, appellee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ahrens & Ott Manufacturing Co. v. HoeherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Gatz v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Mobley v. Carter CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Emler v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Jones v. FlahertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Weddington v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Hendrie v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Figuccion v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API