Figuccion v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
. Opinion op tub Court by
Stanley, Commissioner—
'Reversing.
The appellant, James C. Pignccion, and three others, Westerfield, Nichols, and Hafner, had b.een for ■several years the agents of the appellee Prudential Insurance Company of America, working under the supervision of its Louisville manager, the appellee J. E. ■Oraigle. They were principally engaged in writing Industrial insurance. They received fixed salaries and •additional compensation, which varied according to new business procured or old business lost. It was the rule •of the company that the agents make weekly settlements of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Ahrens & Ott Manufacturing Co. v. HoeherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Weddington v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Gatz v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Westerfield v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
- Baber v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Peel v. BramlettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Barbara Lane Stores, Inc. v. BrumleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Hughes v. Van BruggenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.