Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Metz

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 18, 1966No. 19,047PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

On his plea of guilty, a general court-martial at Fort Polk, Louisiana, convicted the accused of unauthorized absence, failure to obey a lawful order, and escape from confinement, in violation of Articles 86, 92, and 95, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886, 892, and 895, respectively. It sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement at hard labor for one year. The convening authority reduced the period of confinement to nine months, in accordance with a pretrial agreement with the accused, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. GordonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. CoulterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. ClissonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. CrunkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. McCormickU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. JamesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975
  3. United States v. MarklandU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
  4. United States v. ChandlerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  5. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API