Legal Opinion

Hawkey v. Peirsel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2005PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 In this medical malpractice action, George D. and Monica J. Hawkey (Haw-keys) appeal the trial court’s denial of their post-trial motions challenging the trial court’s refusal to permit them to raise an adverse inference argument during their closing statement and the court’s refusal to admit evidence offered by the Hawkeys that they claim bore directly on the defendant physician’s qualifications to practice emergency medicine. Finding no merit in their arguments on appeal, we affirm.

¶ 2 This case began when George Haw-key suffered a dog bite on his hand. Immediately…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Bentivoglio v. RalstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Turney Media Fuel, Inc. v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. McCormick v. Northeastern BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Kovach v. SolomonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Karn v. Quick & Reilly Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Crespo, A. v. Hughes, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Stowe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Nazarak, S. v. Waite, R., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API